Disclaimer: LDN is not FDA-approved for pain or any other indication. It is still a highly experimental approach. The aim of this post is to outline scientific research for informational purposes only. If you are interested in LDN, it is important to talk to your healthcare provider about its possible effectiveness, side effects, and risks.
Before the concept of low-dose naltrexone was born, high doses of this drug were used in conventional medicine for completely different purposes.
Naltrexone is a drug that blocks the activity of opioids in the brain. Your body normally produces endorphins and enkephalins, natural opioids that contribute to feel-good sensations. In fact, these chemicals are the body’s most powerful reward and pleasure system [1, 2].
Opioid drugs can provide relief from chronic, intense pain. But they don’t come without risks: high doses can slow or even stop breathing and exaggerate feelings of calm, euphoria, and pleasure when abused.
Opioid drugs include both prescription painkillers like Vicodin and Percocet, as well as drugs of abuse like fentanyl.
Although we are currently seeing the disastrous effects of the opioid epidemic – from doctors over-prescribing opioid painkillers to extremely potent opioids like fentanyl reaching the streets – the concept of reversing opioid activity dates back to a time before this crisis began [3, 4, 5].
The opioid blocker naltrexone was synthesized in the 60s and approved in the 80s for treating opioid addiction .
Doctors gave naltrexone to opioid addicts in recovery to prevent relapse. The rationale was to completely shut off the ‘high’ of abused narcotics. By blocking all receptors in advance, naltrexone renders narcotics powerless.
Note: Naltrexone shouldn’t be confused with naloxone (Narcan), although both drugs are opioid blockers. You may have heard about naloxone kits (spray or injection) that can save lives in opioid overdose. Naloxone is a better choice for reversing overdose because it starts to act faster and lasts for a shorter time, as is desirable in emergency situations. Naltrexone, on the other hand, takes a couple of hours just to kick in [7, 8].
Around the same time when naloxone was being used for opioid addiction in mainstream clinics, New York-based physician Dr. Bernard Bihari started using the drug in very low doses in the midst of the first AIDS epidemic.
By attempting the impossible – using an opioid blocker to enhance the immune response in people with an “untreatable” disease – Dr. Bihari spurred a lot of attention.
He was initially working with opiate addicts when he observed that high-dose naltrexone seemed to make the body triple endorphin production. However, it caused too many side effects, such as insomnia and the inability to handle stress. Few would stay on it .
To re-wind: opioid-like endorphins are not only released to help us cope with everyday social situations free of fear, pain, and anxiety. They also play an important role in acute stress and the fight-or-flight response .
Interested in the drug’s immune effects, Dr. Bihari started prescribing a range of naltrexone doses to HIV patients. His goal was to find the best dose that would boost endorphins without causing negative effects.
Surprisingly, it turned out that a small naltrexone dose (3 – 5 mg) increased endorphins to the same extent as a high dose .
Next, he ran a 9-month LDN trial in people with AIDS and described the results as promising. After realizing the immune-normalizing potential of LDN for AIDS, Dr. Bihari hypothesized its application for a wide range of autoimmune diseases .
However, it wasn’t until 2007 that the first low-dose naltrexone (LDN) clinical trial was published. All the while, science has been gaining a lot of insight into the intricate workings of endorphins and opioids in the body.
Some small LDN studies have been published and LDS has gained attention as a potential complementary approach to many chronic diseases. Yet the opinions about its clinical use are mixed, and rightly so .
Despite some encouraging findings and anecdotes, we still know less than we don’t about LDN. Proper, large-scale trials are lacking. Most of the data relies on Dr. Bihari’s observations, small-scale studies, and clinical and personal experiences. Because of this, there’s still insufficient evidence to recommend LDN for any indication.
- Used off-label for autoimmune diseases, chronic pain, and inflammation
- Claimed to increase natural opioids and balance the immune system
- Limited studies suggest side effects are mostly rare and mild
- Likely few drug interactions
- Large-scale studies lacking
- Not enough data to rate effectiveness
- Unapproved, unofficial use (off-label)
- Dosing usually has to be adjusted to each individual
- Use largely relies on clinical expertise
- Long-term safety unknown
The mechanism outlined here and proposed by Dr. Bihari is considered to be a controversial scientific hypothesis. It hasn’t been confirmed in large trials or, therefore, accepted by most medical doctors and experts. Proper clinical studies have yet to verify most of Dr. Bihar’s claims.
With this in mind, let’s take a look at how LDN is hypothesized to work.
Dr. Bihari considered that low naltrexone doses block opioid receptors for a short time – about 3 hours. In response, the body seems to increase the production of endorphins. According to Dr. Bihari, a small late-evening dose of naltrexone will boost endorphin production by 300% [9, 1].
He said that although naltrexone is cleared away by the morning, endorphins stay high all the next day. The endorphin blockage from low-dose naltrexone is described as mild and short. Essentially, it’s thought to increase the activity of opioids [9, 1].
Dr. Bihari believed that the rise in endorphin levels remains for as long as a person is taking the low dose every night.
Beta-endorphin, one of our main natural opioids, has a long half-life of about 20 hours in the body. It’s unknown for how long other endorphins stay high in the blood.
- Mu receptors are in the brain and help with pain relief.
- Delta receptors may play a role in cancer and the immune system.
There are several other receptor types that may be important for the action of LDN, but these two appear to play the largest role .
The concept of “stimulating by blocking” is not an easy one. Let’s dive a bit deeper.
The hypothalamus is a structure in the base of the brain and part of the limbic system, which orchestrates emotions, motivation, and learning. Low-dose naltrexone is thought to block opioid receptors in the hypothalamus .
In response to the short-term blockage, Dr. Bihari said that the brain begins producing more of a prohormone called proopiomelanocortin during the night. Next, this hormone is broken up into 3 others in the pea-sized “master gland” called the pituitary:
Aside from these direct effects on the brain, Dr. Bihari thought that LDN may also signal the adrenals to make more enkephalin via another prohormone called proenkephalin.
This is a normal response, as the body interprets blocked receptors as a signal that endorphins are low. To compensate, it increases their production. For this reason, Dr. Bihari would say that LDN increases natural opioids – endorphins and enkephalins – by blocking.
He said that if the receptors are blocked by a high dose, they don’t get to recover and stay shut off. According to him, the ideal dose should maximally increase endorphins while minimally blocking them .
To understand how LDN might work, some scientists are trying to get to the bottom of how complex diseases like cancer, autoimmunity, and mood imbalances may be connected to endorphins. Their work is still in the early stages and nobody yet has any conclusive answers.
According to one theory that has yet to be verified, low blood levels of endorphins might contribute to immune deficiencies, and this link has been implicated in cancer and autoimmune diseases. Similarly, HIV/AIDS is accelerated by a deficiency of endorphins. Of course, they are not the only potential cause, but might be a piece of the puzzle .
Low endorphins are highly unlikely to be the only causative factor of autoimmune problems, mood disorders, or any other complex disease. These diseases always involve multiple possible factors–including the body’s chemistry, environment, health status, and genetics–that often vary from one person to another.
Another interesting scientific concept is the so-called “sickness response” or “sickness behavior.” When people are faced with a disease – be it cancer or depression – they tend to isolate themselves while the body increases inflammation and alters the immune response .
To draw a parallel, sickness behavior is well-known to scientists in the animal world: animals will isolate themselves for a short period of time when faced with an infection or disease to avoid contaminating others.
Sickness behavior can become devastating if it stops to serve a purpose and turns into chronic low mood and energy. It turns out that low endorphins may be the culprit of this complex psychological and emotional response in humans, at least according to certain research groups .
LDN is an experimental approach. Despite ongoing scientific efforts, there’s not enough clinical data about its effectiveness. Thus, it is often thrown into the “alternative treatments” bucket, but it is not illegal.
Naltrexone is a drug licensed and approved by the FDA, meaning that doctors can prescribe it. However, it’s not approved for the indications we focus on in this article. That makes the use of LDN “off-label.”
The following purported benefits are only supported by limited, low-quality clinical studies.
There is insufficient evidence to support the use of LDN for any of the below listed uses. LDN should never be used as a replacement for approved medical therapies.
According to Dr. Bihari, LDN might support a healthy immune response by rebalancing T-helper cells, the so-called “master cells” of the immune system. People with autoimmune issues tend to have impaired T-helper cell function .
A specific subtype of these T-helper cells are Tregs (5% – 10%), which are thought to be responsible for suppressing harmful Th1, Th2, and Th17 overactivation. Scientists think they prevent the immune system from going into an autoimmune overdrive and attacking itself [14, 15].
The whole hypothetical basis for these potential effects stems from Dr. Bihar’s claims about LDN boosting endorphins. Higher endorphins are thought to subsequently rearranging of cells in the immune system. This mechanism hasn’t been proven .
Although Dr. Bihari claimed that LDN can help people with a range of autoimmune diseases (including lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, eczema, and psoriasis), clinical studies have yet to verify his claims.
Scientists are also investigating whether LDN blocks the activation of microglia, a type of immune cell in the brain and nervous system. Microglia normally stay in a resting state and are woken up only by brain damage or infection .
Their activation is considered to underlie common symptoms in autoimmune and other diseases (see “sickness behavior”): fatigue, fever, inflammation, and pain .
Conditions that have been at least partially researched are listed below.
Some doctors claim that LDN may also help with other diseases with an autoimmune component, such as Hashimoto’s. Anecdotally, it improves thyroid health, lowers antibodies and the need for additional drugs. Research is completely lacking to support these uses, though.
The evidence to support LDN use in MS is conflicting. Future trials are yet to determine its safety and effectiveness.
In one study of 96 people with MS, 8 weeks of LDN (4.5 mg/day) did not provide more relief than placebo .
In contrast, LDN improved mental health and quality of life in another pilot study of 60 people with MS, using a similar protocol .
One study tracked 4 women with MS prescribed LDN, suggesting that it might be safe under medical supervision. Women who took LDN didn’t report any side effects and their symptoms stabilized or improved, as did their quality of life and fatigue. We can’t, however, draw any conclusions from a report on four people .
As with MS, there’s insufficient evidence to rate LDN for rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. Only a couple of small studies have been carried out, while proper clinical trials are lacking.
In a low-quality study of 10 people with rheumatoid arthritis, LDN reduced joint pain and swelling. A few weeks after they stopped taking LDN, most experienced periods of severe stress and disease worsening .
Fibromyalgia is not technically classified as an autoimmune disease, although it triggers many of the same symptoms. Initial LDN research seems to offer some hope for people suffering from this otherwise hard-to-treat disease, but it’s too early to say whether it works [19, 20].
A group at Stanford University found that LDN (4.5 mg/day) reduces pain, fatigue, inflammation, and stress in people with fibromyalgia while boosting mood. LDN was safe and well-tolerated .
Another small clinical trial uncovered that people with fibromyalgia have lower endorphins or a “low opioid tone.” LDN reversed their low levels, thereby improving pain tolerance. Interestingly, it also enhanced the patients’ ability to relate interpersonally and engage in relationships .
On the one hand, this hints at the potentially profound physical and emotional effect of endorphins.
On the other hand, these findings indicate that scientists are still just scratching the surface. Much more research on the impact of LDN on people with fibromyalgia and autoimmune diseases is needed.
There is not enough evidence about the use of LDN for chronic pain conditions. However, some doctors prescribe LDN off-label for this indication. Proper clinical research is needed to support this experimental practice.
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a form of chronic pain that can be excruciating. Limited research suggests that it is worsened by SIBO, obstructive sleep apnea, and microglial activation in the brain .
By keeping the microglia in a resting state and increasing endorphins, low-dose naltrexone is hypothesized to reduce the pain and inflammation in CRPS. Yet, no clinical trials back up this use .
A lot of people with CRPS experience a movement disorder called dystonia, which causes painful muscle contractions. In a report, LDN lowered pain and dystonia in two people with CRPS. The authors claimed that it worked by silencing microglia that trigger inflammation and pain .
However, we can’t know if LDN affects CRPS symptoms based on this case report. Its safety and effectiveness need to be explored in proper human studies.
In animals and cells, LDN increases the number of receptors for opioids and cannabinoids, which might theoretically boost the response to these natural painkillers. Combined, LDN and acupuncture are hypothesized to achieve greater synergy, but clinical trials haven’t tested this yet .
Another group of researchers think that LDN may enhance the effects of cannabinoids and opioids on pain. In 10 people, ultra-low-dose naltrexone enhanced the painkilling effect of an opioid drug, buprenorphine. They concluded that such an effect is not surprising since LDN appears to increase natural opioids. However, their findings haven’t been replicated .
In addition, LDN reduced tolerance to morphine in another study in mice. Thus, clinical trials should examine if it can help people with severe pain stay on lower morphine dose over a longer period of time .
The effects of LDN on seizures are unknown. Human data are lacking.
In mice, LDN increased the anti-seizure effects of opioids and cannabinoids. These findings suggest that future studies might focus on people with epilepsy, especially those who use medical cannabis .
In one case report, a person with this condition experienced pain relief with LDN (3 – 4.5mg/day). The authors hypothesized that it might reverse microglial activation and boost endorphins, which would reduce nerve inflammation and pain. However, it’s impossible to know if LDN has any effect on this condition based on a single case. Both animal and human studies are needed .
Despite some promising small studies, there’s not enough data to determine whether LDN helps people with IBS or IBD.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is claimed to have many hidden causes, but stress, inflammation, and autoimmunity are often said to be a large part of it.
In one study of 42 people with IBS, ultra-low doses of naltrexone (0.5 mg/day) reduced pain and provided overall symptom relief in 76% of the cases after 4 weeks. LDN was deemed to be safe and side effects were not reported .
In a study of 14 children with Crohn’s, LDN caused remission in one-fourth of the cases, while two-thirds improved. An 8-week course of treatment also improved their overall and social quality of life. Future studies are needed to verify these findings .
In 40 patients with drug-resistant ulcerative colitis, 30% responded to LDN treatment and 20% experienced long-lasting improvements. Many of the long-term responders went into remission while 3 people relapsed. Larger, better-designed studies are needed .
Aside from sporadic clinical anecdotes, only a couple of small studies looked at the effects of LDN on fatigue and nerve disorders. More research is needed to determine its safety and effectiveness.
Anecdotally, low-dose naltrexone is said to reduce fatigue and overall symptoms in people with Parkinson’s disease. In one small study of 8 people with Parkinson’s, LDN improved fatigue over 8 months without reported side effects .
Other clinical anecdotes mention that LDN may help people with incurable degenerative illnesses such as ALS (Lou Gehrig’s Disease) and PLS. These diseases may have an autoimmune component, so certain doctors believe that LDN may protect the brain from further damage by increasing natural endorphins. Yet, scientific data are lacking.
Reports from 15 ALS patients who used LDN are mixed :
- About half didn’t experience any effect or were unsure
- One-third reported moderate efficacy
- One-fifth reported slight efficacy
“Efficacy” included improvements in balance and speech, more energy and less phlegm, and easier breathing. However, these reports were subjective, un-blinded, and had many other limitations .
At first, naltrexone was researched in regular, high doses, in an attempt to see if it can improve symptoms of autism in children. The research rationale was that the opioid system and endorphins have profound effects on social interactions, which are impaired in autism.
These early studies did report increased endorphins and improved symptoms in autistic children who received naltrexone. The doses ranged from 5 to 50 mg/day, used every other day.
All in all, 90% of the published studies were done with high doses.
Nonetheless, some doctors prescribe low-dose naltrexone to children with autism. They claim that only low doses have the potential to boost stress resilience, social bonding, emotional well-being, mood, and immunity.
Dr. Jaquelyn McCandless, an LDN advocate, reported positive effects of LDN formulated as a transdermal cream in children with autism after 8 weeks. Each patch contained 3mg of naltrexone and was given between 9 and 12 pm.
She also included a couple of adults with Crohn’s Disease and one with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome to test the 4.5mg patch. According to her, “everyone responded positively.”
However, Dr. McCandless did not conduct a proper clinical study. Rather, this was a mere clinical observation, which had a high potential for bias. A placebo effect was also likely. We need proper clinical trials to know whether LDN can help some people with autism.
The effects of LDN on stress and PTSD are being researched, but no clinical research is yet available to back up its use.
Even doctors who prescribe LDN based on experience say that it should always be part of an integrated psychotherapeutic approach for complex mental health issues.
Some researchers believe that, by raising natural opioid activity, LDN may increase resilience to stress and fine-tune some emotional imbalances. Its immune-balancing effects are also described as having a potentially positive impact on mood .
In one study, LDN (2 – 6 mg/day) helped 11 out of 15 people with severe, trauma-related dissociative disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They reported a clearer perception of both their own body, their inner life, and their surroundings. These findings have not been replicated and no other trials have been carried out .
High-dose naltrexone (and naloxone) is still a conventional treatment for opioid use disorders. On the other hand, LDN remains experimental and controversial. There’s not enough evidence to determine whether it works.
Some scientists think it may help people with addictions by boosting natural opioids and reducing the need for stronger external triggers such as drugs, alcohol, or cigarettes. This theory hasn’t been verified.
In a study that tracked 10,000 people, LDN improved pain tolerance and interpersonal interactions in post-detox patients .
In 127 people undergoing a 6-day methadone taper, very-low-dose naltrexone (0.125 – 0.25 mg/day) with another drug (clonidine) reduced the intensity and stress of withdrawal. It lowered cravings, anxiety, restlessness, bone and muscle aches, and sweating .
In one study with 130 heavy-drinking smokers, the combination of medium-dose naltrexone (25 mg/day) and the smoking-cessation drug varenicline reduced cigarette and alcohol cravings, as well as the intensity of the “high” from both substances .
The naltrexone dose was relatively high: 5-fold the dose that Dr. Bihari and other clinical studies of LDN used. Scientists consider that this initially higher dose may help stop smoking and drinking to start with, after which the dose can be lowered to boost natural opioid activity. More research is needed .
The effects of LDN on cocaine addiction in humans are unknown. In rats, LDN with a dopamine-blocking drug (L-tetrahydropalmatine) prevented cocaine abuse relapse. It reduced drug-seeking behavior and increased endorphins without causing fatigue and sedation. Human trials are required .
LDN for HIV/AIDS is highly controversial. The only data about its use comes from Dr. Bihari’s opinions. His claims rely only on clinical experience, and no studies have confirmed them. Thus, LDN is considered an unproven approach to HIV/AIDS management.
The whole concept of low-dose naltrexone started with HIV/AIDS patients, when Dr. Bihari formulated his theory that it enhances a compromised immune system. He claimed to have administered LDN to hundreds of HIV/AIDS patients, some of which allegedly no longer had detectable levels of the virus .
Having in mind that naltrexone is a very affordable drug and that millions of people suffer from HIV/AIDS in the developing world, clinical trials are warranted. In fact, one study mentions that LDN has been approved in Nigeria as an AIDS treatment .
Dr. Bihari considered that low naltrexone doses may also help people with other types of chronic infections, such as tuberculosis, Lyme, genital herpes, and even Hepatitis C. According to him, the same rationale follows: “LDN boosts immunity and the ability to fight off infections.” Yet LDN has not been researched at all in people with these types of chronic infections.
LDN does not treat cancer. It was never properly researched in cancer patients and should not be recommended due to a lack of data.
Nonetheless, LDN has been popularly proposed as beneficial for various cancers–the list is almost endless and covering bladder, breast, colorectal cancer, brain, liver cancer, lung, blood and bone marrow, skin, cancers of the reproductive organs, and many others.
But before LDN is announced a “miracle cancer drug,” have in mind that the evidence is either anecdotal or stems from animal studies. There’s no proof that it can do anything for people with cancer.
No proper clinical studies have examined its effects on cancer. What’s more, many animal studies used it only as an add-on to conventional treatments.
For example, in mice with ovarian cancer, LDN coupled with chemotherapy (cisplatin) was studied for its potential to increase treatment efficacy and reduce side effects .
In one study of 10 advanced cancer patients who failed standard therapy, LDN (5mg/day) was given with alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) and hydroxycitrate as part of end-of-life (palliative) care. The sample was extremely small and the study was not blinded or randomized .
ALA/LDN appeared to be safe in the study. Some patients were given this combination in addition to chemotherapy. One patient was described as a responder, five patients were said to have had slower cancer progression, and the remaining four died shortly. These improvements were not ascribed to ALA/LDN, since patients were receiving other therapies as usual .
Long-term survival of a person with advanced cancer treated with LDN and alpha-lipoic acid has been reported. The man had pancreatic cancer and metastases to the liver. He was alive and well almost 7 years later — far beyond expectations. But it’s impossible to know which factors impacted his survival, and LDN might not have been a relevant one .
Three other similar pancreatic cancer cases were described. One was doing well 3 years later, and the other two had confirmed remissions after 5 and 4 months of treatment. Other factors that could’ve impacted survival were not described 
- ALA on oxidative stress and inflammation (via NFkB) in cancer cells
- LDN on the immune response and opioid receptors in tumors, which might theoretically change their response to the growth-inhibiting effects of endorphins and the number and activity of immune cells that may be involved in cancer (cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells)
Dr. Bihari spoke of witnessing cancer improvements in his patients prescribed LDN. He also observed that, in contrast, high doses of naltrexone may have the opposite effects and worsen cancer growth, probably by reducing opioid activity. Whether there is truth in his claims remains to be determined .
Other studies of LDN for cancer are currently in progress, some of which are funded by the National Cancer Institute .
Consult with your physician before taking low-dose naltrexone. This medication requires a prescription and should only be used under the guidance of a qualified healthcare professional.
- LDN is usually taken only once a day before bedtime as 90% of endorphins are hypothesized to be made during the night .
- The dosage typically ranges from 1.5 mg to 5 mg/day*.
- Slow/timed-release naltrexone and LDN capsules that contain calcium carbonate filters should be avoided .
- Pills are the most common form, but topical creams and patches have also been developed; they may work better for children or people who have difficulty swallowing.
- Naltrexone is commercially available only at a 50mg dose, which means that people need to get their prescribed low-dose formulation from a compounding pharmacy .
*Dr. Bihari considers that the dose should be no less than 1.75 – 2 mg/day and no higher than 4.5 – 5 mg/day. He used to say that 3 mg/day is a good dose that works for most people .
This is where the confusion kicks in, as some studies used so-called “ultra low-doses,” ones that range from 0.125-0.5 mg/day. On the other hand, borderline doses of 0.5-1 mg/day are considered “very low-dose” .
There is no clear benefit to very or ultra-low doses, based on the published studies. However, each person is different and your doctor may consider that doses in this range will work better for you.
There are many natural factors that may increase internal opioids. In theory, these may work in synergy with low-dose naltrexone – but this synergy was never tested in trials.
The following is purely theoretical. Mostly based on studies on cells or animals, these factors are hypothesized to either increase the activation and sensitivity of receptors or boost endorphin production:
- Cold exposure 
- High-intensity exercise [50, 51]
- Sleep 
- Sun exposure/UVB [53, 54]
- Warm showers 
- Social interaction 
- Massages 
- Tasty food [57, 58]
- Acupuncture 
- Magnesium [60, 61]
- Butyrate 
- Capsaicin/Chili peppers 
- Acidophilus probiotics 
- Melatonin 
- LLLT 
- Oxytocin 
- CBD 
Depending on your health concerns and lifestyle, some of these may work better than others. Make sure to speak to your doctor before making any changes to your lifestyle or supplements regime.
You may try the additional strategies listed above if you and your doctor determine that they could be appropriate. None of these strategies should ever be done in place of what your doctor recommends or prescribes.
This list does not cover all possible side effects. Contact your doctor or pharmacist if you notice any other side effects.
Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. In the US, you may report side effects to the FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or at www.fda.gov/medwatch. In Canada, you may report side effects to Health Canada at 1-866-234-2345.
Some people experience vivid dreams (or rarely nightmares), which tend to go away with time. Insomnia is another possible side effect. In such cases, dosing can be moved to the morning .
Dr. Bihari added that poor sleep is the only side effect he noticed in a very small percentage of people on 3 mg/day. He considers that lowering the dose (to 1.5 – 2 mg/day) is a better solution than moving it to the morning .
In such cases, some practitioners recommend natural calming supplements or lifestyle adjustments to help people overcome mild sleep issues while on low-dose naltrexone. They include magnesium, melatonin, and hops.
According to the published studies, mild headaches are also possible. Some physicians reported anxiety, but this was mostly in people undergoing opioid withdrawal and possibly not related to naltrexone .
There are anecdotes of people with chronic fatigue and “mold illness” not reacting well to LDN, though these diagnoses are considered controversial. Be sure to see a board-certified physician to get an accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Major side effects in the published clinical trials to-date have not been reported.
Keep in mind that the side effects profile and drug interactions of LDN are relatively unknown, given the lack of well-designed clinical studies.
Limited evidence suggests that LDN should not be used with opioid painkillers: codeine, morphine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, and methadone. Low doses of naltrexone may block opioid receptors and temporarily reduce their effectiveness .
People who used (or abused) opioids long-term may require 10 days to 2 weeks before LDN treatment. Your doctor will be able to assess this based on your individual situation.
People who have had organ transplants and are taking immunosuppressive drugs permanently are cautioned against the use of LDN.
According to some anecdotes, LDN may affect thyroid hormone balance.
Naltrexone is a drug that blocks opioid receptors. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) is being researched in people with autoimmune diseases, chronic pain, inflammation, fatigue, cancer, and autism. However, there’s still insufficient evidence to back up its use.
LDN is claimed to boost the body’s natural opioids – endorphins and enkephalins – and rebalance the immune system.
People need to get LDN in a compounding pharmacy with a doctor’s prescription.